Find a Lawyer

SAJID SAEED HUSSAIN SINDHU versus STATE

Before the arrest of the Section 498 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 489F arrest, the certifier filed an FIR against his former employee for stealing some checks, including a lawsuit. Documents revealed that the suspects had reported it. The bank had instructed the bank in connection with the theft of the checks and also did not disclose the check, which included a check issued by the complainant Prima in which the accused claimed that the checks had been stolen. , It appears to be true that comparing the signatures of the accused sent to the science inquiry laboratory and the report of the forensic science laboratory revealed that the signature of the accused was not in accordance with the signature of the accused samples. I was shown that the check was not issued or signed under the first question. The offense under Section 489F, the PPC being sentenced to a maximum of three years, did not come under the purview of Section 497, the prohibited clause of the CCP, since these documents were in nature, which were before the police. He was in his possession, the police did not need the body of the accused for interrogation, the interim pre-arrest bail was granted, in the circumstances confirmed. famous supreme court advocate from Phoolnagar (Bhai Pheru) lawyer