Find a Lawyer

BASHIR AHMAD versus STATE

Cases 324, 337A (iii), 34 Criminal Code (v. 1898), Articles 221, 342, 355 and 530 are being remanded, which postponed the trial. The court, some of the charges, prosecuted During the hearing, the statements of the material prosecution witnesses were recorded. According to the law, the parties were not properly formed against the accused and no substantive evidence was presented to them by recording the statements of the accused under Section 2342, CRPC, during the trial of the appellate court. The court convicted and remanded the accused in connection with such illegal acts. The trial case was taken by the accused that the appellate court should have acquitted him, rather than seeking remand for trial, the trial court's abuses by the trial court. The trial court was bound to record the evidence itself. His ruling violated such law was an unlawful act that made the trial unsuccessful. The accused failed to identify, illegal, or in any way identify the accused. Lower Appellate Court High Court refuses to interfere with lower appellate court's decision seeking reconsideration of judicial amendment. law websites from Lower Dir lawyer