Find a Lawyer

ABDUL RAZZAQ versus MUHAMMAD SALEEM

Section 4, 20, 6 406, 8 46 Pro and 6 506 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 417 of the appeal against the accused against the accused was that he had purchased the steel from the appellant / complainant and had checked it. But said that the check was found to be a fraudulent complainant, when he complained during the hearing, as a prosecutor's witness in court, never submitted the check or slip issued by the bank stating that That money didn't exist. And in fact the words given in the slip were referenced in drawings that were not presented to the slip during the investigation or before the trial court complained of excessive pressure on a bank employee's statement, But this employee had never done so. In his examination, the Chief stated that he was an employee of the said branch of the bank at that date when the complaint was prepared. The complainant also filed a civil suit under OXXVII CPC to recover the money, Was the price that was purchased by the accused. immigration advocates phone number from Jehangira lawyer