MST. MANZOORAN versus MUHAMMAD NAWAZ
Section 2302 / Cri 34 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 417 (2A) against the eyewitnesses who were acquitted did not seek to apprehend the accused even though one of them was a female and was not a deadly weapon. And none of them reported the matter to the police and remained silent for three days. During this period of testimony, Silence complained at the trial that the complainant was late in filing an FIR, and it appears that a motivating part of it was any direct evidence. The prosecution's case was not upheld by the trial court because the trial court did not deny the reason given for acquittal of the accused, nor did any artificial nor any interference in the adjudication decision be sought accordingly. Was done
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firm from Dhirkot lawyer
