Find a Lawyer

MST. SHAH JAHAN versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT J14DGE, RAWALPINDI

Article 5 and Schedule to the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Request Record of the removal of suits by courts below the jewelry given to the wife as a gift to the wives in the suit for the last restoration and recovery of gifted articles. Evidence on the evidence shown at 17 shows that the husband used to beat his wife habitually resulting in abortion. The reconciliation efforts did not succeed because of resistance from the husband and his wife's wife while abortion. She was unable to do so because of her husband's beating. She is believed to have taken the gold jewelry with her. For the abortion, the husband did not inform his wife's parents at the hospital that it was normal for the wife to go to her parents after the abortion, He was not allowed to return. Evidence from her husband or her parents living with her did not support her husband's claim that the jewelry was still with his wife. The wife did not leave her husband voluntarily, but the husband abandoned his job. Was. The High Court had directed the husband to make unreasonable decisions through the courts to hand over the jewelry or its value within the specified time to his wife and also to give it to his wife in addition. ? Pay for her care until the family court approves the decision, and then, if she chooses not to pay the marital rights, she will not be entitled to any restitution. \ r \ n \ r \ n law websites from Kotla Jam lawyer