Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHAFIQUE versus STATE

Article 302/324/148/144 Appraisal of evidence Cage Sentencing, reduction of mitigating circumstances In this case the motivation was double-dimensional, did not give convincing support to the prosecutor's story, decisively significant about the responsibility for the incident. Can't be the cause, especially in the case of murder, most of the prosecution witnesses, who were also witnesses to the incident, suffered multiple injuries to different parts of their body, similar to that in relation to multiple suspects. Because they were also injured, both sides tried to suppress the hard facts by the prosecution witnesses, no, they suspected each other. S with the relationship, but there was a very strong objective may simply no basis to impose their reputation is not false witnesses accuse the defendants together. Neither side was present in the dispute in the presence of the two sides, in the context of the issue of deposition of the prosecution witnesses, their relationship was to be weighed out, no witness was an outsider and no alien was charged. ? All of this was from the vicinity of the events, which provided evidence and made the presence of witnesses in the natural and logical circumstances that the suspect was killed with a knife, in what circumstances The record was not specified. Both sides suffered injuries in this incident by either party, but nevertheless they did not appear in front of the whole party in an attempt to defend their claim and accused the opposition of aggression, deliberately realizing the facts. Also investigated by hiding. Attempts were made to show that the parties' side online advocate from Khewra lawyer