Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD HANIF versus MUHAMMAD RAFIQ

In the section 10 jury scheme the allotment dispute was allotted to the defendant and one another in the interest of the defendant, and after the death of the predator in the interest of the defendant, the dispute arose because the applicant claimed that the land in the dispute was allotted to him. Was done The trial court and the appellate court ruled concurrently, and the defendants were declared owners of the land and the applicant had no ground for the suit, no place for interference with the conclusions entered by the courts. In the presence of which was fully supported. Records have been excluded from the review against the said concurrent results property advocate from Mir Ali lawyer