MUHAMMAD SAJAD versus STATE
Section 497 Prevention Code (XLV of 1860), Section 392/411 bailout, grant of the whole incident was unwarranted, as no accused was identified except the complainant who was, as usual, the appropriate legal course. Was not adopted. Under the Law Enforcement Act, section 2222 was held to hold a legal parade for the identification of the original suspect, 1984 1984 the evidence of two mobile phone retrieval from the accused was not substantiated by any independent evidence. And he could not justify his punishment. Identity tests could not be relieved only because the accused who committed the robbery was later found in possession of the stolen goods.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Kahror Pacca lawyer