RANA ZAHID SAEED versus JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, SAHIWAL
Article 5 and Schedule of the West Pakistan Family Courts Rules, 1965, R6 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application for dissolution of marriage Jurisdiction of the plaintiff Returning the jurisdiction of the prosecuting jurisdiction of the court Objected and the petition for return of the case was moved on the basis that the plaintiff being a resident of the Family Court of SM had no legal jurisdiction as per the law of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act. , 1964 and the rules and regulations laid down under it in Rule 6 of the West Pakistan Family Courts. There are. According to the Rules, 1965, there is usually jurisdiction of the court where the cause of action, wholly or in part, has arisen or the parties have resided or have taken final residence, however, under this rule, the West Pakistan Family Courts The R6 will receive a discount. Rules, 1965, provided that in cases of marriage or Dwyer dissolution, the jurisdiction shall also be bound by a court where the WiFi-based legislature intended to facilitate things for the wife and to travel with her. Disability was to end. The court will have the option of filing such a case with the wife and the convenience thereof. Thus, in cases where a wife is allowed to choose her court of justice with justice, no limit was found to be illegal under the law-imposed order, while the constitutional petition was rejected without merit.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
