Find a Lawyer

SULEMAN DAUD versus LAHORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY THROUGH DIRECTOR GENERAL

Sections 4 and 8 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 23, 24, 25 and 1991 Constitutional application for the discrimination of the right of investment property through the Foreign National Pakistani Protection for Economic Reform Act, 1992, the expected applicant to be a Pakistani. The principle was fixed overseas and also acquired foreign citizenship, in which the petitioner invested in Pakistan through foreign exchange overseas and bought land, which authorities wanted to include in the housing scheme. The applicant's complaint was that the land was due to the protection available to them Can't retrieve Under the Protection of Economic Reforms Act, 1992, the applicant also claimed that the authorities had waived a number of lands in the property of others but did not exempt their land even if it was assumed that all Landlords cannot be treated this way for any reason, so the applicant will still apply. Applying foreign exchange, making better claims, living on a better destination of the land he bought it from overseas remittances, the applicant was contending and yearning to remove a piece of his property, which is so big. Was not in any way disrupting the project, its effectiveness and efficacy. The Housing Scheme was similarly excluded when the applicant's property was acquired for another residential scheme. It cannot be recovered for the same purpose as the applicant had obtained the right to withhold it on such expulsion, which also created a legitimate expectation that Miss. tax advocates from Domeli lawyer