MUHAMMAD AHMAD ALI KHAN versus PRESIDENT OF PAKISTAN
Para 3 (1) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) In the case of Muhammad Israr Nabi case, the service tribunal failed to examine the merits of the service tribunal's jurisdiction presented in PLD 1980 SC 292. Mandatory retirement from the rule is that even though the applicant failed to create misconduct by the authority whose name was passed under the MLR 114, the applicant's mandatory retirement name was approved by the administration. The tribunal was empowered to sit as a court of appeal, and the fact is that the applicant's merits were examined. With this question even reached a conclusion that the applicant was not properly retired, Sue Sue is on each case, the applicant will be deprived of it. Failure to properly examine the service tribunal's retirement matter in detail
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
