Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASIF KHAN versus PROVINCE OF SINDH

Article 199 Constitutional Petition Demanding Relief Becomes Disappointing University's Cancellation of Graduate-Based Admission to the Third Class of Students at the Educational Institution LLB Part 1 was that the applicant was not eligible to enroll in LLB Part 1 Was. , Since he had graduated in third grade and was in violation of his admission rules / admissions policy. The respondents had canceled the applicant's entry and enrollment card during the approval of the present constitutional petition but no clause in the application or amendment was restored. Petitioner did not have the right to be allowed to appear in the LLB exam because his admission was defective and the application could only be dismissed on the ground that the applicant's admission was in violation of the University Vice-Chancellor's decision. Was canceled against which the university authorities were not asked for any relief. The applicant in LLB Part 1, who was a third party / division graduate, has no option / option to apply. Discharged

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014

• HEERO v. MEHBOOB ALI 2014 PCrLJ 1031
• FIDA ALI SAWANI v. KHAN MUHAMMAD 2014 CLC 1031
• Mrs. ZEENAT AHMED v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Defence 2014 PLC(CS) 1032
• MUHAMMAD WARIS v. STATION HOUSE OFFICER 2014 MLD 1033
• ZAFAR IQBAL v. NASREEN AHMED 2014 CLD 1039
• ABDUL QAYYUM v. State 2014 MLD 1046
• UMER FAROOQUE v. JUDGE, ANTI-TERRORISM COURT, MIRPURKHAS 2014 PCrLJ 1052
• ASIF TRADERS v. COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS through Assistant Collector 2014 PTD 1057

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2014 →

best advocate from Parachinar lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes