Find a Lawyer

SHAHZAD ALIAS SAHIB versus STATE

Section 2 30b (b) / re 34 Definition of evidence The benefit of the doubt was no recovery proceedings from the accused There was no light in the FIR to replace the incident, but a later investigation to improve the prosecution's story. The electric bulb was shown in a rough site plan prepared by the investigating officer and in the site plan prepared by the draftsman; both witnesses, who were presented by the prosecutor, were not residents of the incident site, in adjoining houses. No one had proceeded to be removed from the scene of the incident, but neither the complainant, who was the accused, Neither was the father of the deceased nor did the brothers of the victim seek to arrest or resist the attack, saying that the prosecution's witnesses were unprofessional and that they had made the fact of their presence against the accused. Raised doubts about. Witnesses on the scene were very skeptical that their testimony could not be relied upon. Police are not sure if the suspect with whom the accomplice was involved was not reported to the police station, but the police station Outside it was reported that the number of the accused was two, but three of the six allegedly were rescued on the occasion which was against normal human behavior: the court did not believe it. Prosecutor failed to prove his case against the accused without any suspicion to prove the accused, the prosecution case was filled with suspicion, the accused was punished and punished, could not be retained and unclean. The verdict was set aside and the accused were acquitted and released. famous lower court advocate from Mehrab Pur lawyer