HAJI BAKHU versus STATE
Section 426 Appeal Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 302 (b), 324, 336 and 149 Application for suspension of sentence against the accused / accused was that he accompanied the club (SOTA) to the head of the injured prosecution witness. There was a hit. The doctor said that the doctor conducted a medical examination that the applicant's injury had proved to be a life threat to the prosecutor's testimony and that the verdict could be suspended under section 426, CR PCA, after coming to this part. Was. In the presence of oral and medical evidence, at this stage it was difficult to understand that the applicant's sentence was unlikely to be retained at the time of the applicant's decision. Except for the appeal, deep appreciation of the opinion of the police was not valid at this stage nor could it be admitted in evidence nor could anyone be punished directly / accused, given the punishment of being bound by the courts, under the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Gari Habibullah lawyer
