Find a Lawyer

KHIZER HAYAT versus STATE

The denial of the accused was designated in the FIR under section 497 of the Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), sections 337 A (i) and 337 A (iii), and his and his partner were hurt under section 337A. Was charged with implantation. iii), the PPC which was sentenced to 10 years imprisonment and was subjected to a prohibited clause under section 497, the PC case of the CR accused differs from that of his co-accused, therefore, The injury was specifically attributed to the suspect, especially in the FIR. The suspect, listed in the Medico Legal Report, failed to identify any malicious or illegal desire by the complainant or the police to be involved in his crime. Their request for a bail was dismissed by the accused, in which case the trial court overlooked the fact that under Section 337A (iii), the victim was allowed post-arrest bail. The indictment, which the PPC had attracted due to its prohibition in sub-section (1) of section 497, was issued on the CCPC notice stating that the accused were to be found Why his bail was not revoked or returned by the trial court. \ r \ n criminal advocate from Sherani lawyer