Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD IRFAN versus ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, KHUSHAB

Sections 302, 364, 201 and 202 of the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance (XXII of 2000), charged with the appreciation of Section 7 evidence, the accused's age, the determination of the petitioners, who claim to be underage, pleaded that they be prosecuted. To be heard by the Juvenile Court Trial Court. The medical examination of the applicants by the Medical Board, which was in accordance with the report submitted by the radiologist, indicates that the applicant's certificate of leaving school at the time of the alleged incident occurred. The claim that was presented in the evidence was dubious, which could not be relied upon by the applicant's father on Form `B submitted to the National Database and Registration Authority, no confirmation or any official. The stamp was not found to confirm its authenticity. On the date of birth of the second applicant listed on the school leaving certificate and Form `B, the dubious report was submitted by the radiologist who clearly showed that the bones of both the applicants were near the age of 20 years. The medical opinion of the case was not displaced in this case; any chronic weakness in the trial, illegal approach, irregularity of procedure or reasoning. It has been referred to the High Court so that it can exercise its review jurisdiction to guarantee interference in the matter. immigration advocates from Jhatta Bhutta lawyer