Find a Lawyer

KHALIL ALIAS NANNA versus STATE

Section 302 evidence was defined as two versions of the case, one was presented by the prosecution and the other by the defendant in his statement under section 342, CRPC, which the rest of the prosecution had adopted. The statements of the defendant revolve around who was the deceased's uncle and the other prosecution witness who was the victim's son. The remaining eye witnesses were not presented. There will be no previous rivalry or wrongdoing between the parties. Lived 5/6 km away from the scene and did not have the prosecutor's witness at the time of the incident and the complainant The improvement was brought before the trial court dishonesty, but some of the material facts dbakrdya, medical evidence supported the prosecution's case, only to the extent that the deceased lost his life. Because of the injuries caused by the firearms, but he did not support the prosecution's evidence, there was no vacancy from Inquisiton, which the officer did not honestly make a statement to the trial court and prosecuted. Investigations were conducted in a unilateral manner, contradicting the prosecution witnesses and the investigating officer's recording of PW statements and reporting of a post-mortem inspection of the deceased. The incident was taken into custody the very next day of the FIR, recorded after a fact-delay and witnesses exaggerated the incident and there was no confession, according to the prosecution. The testimony of the witnesses can be placed on the testimony, cannot be used against the rehabilitation partner, who was found in the recovery of the weapon. jobs for advocates from Khanewal lawyer