NAWABZADA IFTIKHAR AHMAD KHAN BABAR versus CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSION, ISLAMABAD
Order 14, 52 and 99 (CC) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 199 and 225 in the constitutional petition, not to file appeal against the nomination papers of the candidates who did not qualify for election to the National Assembly Election. The right to bring a defendant's disqualification facts to the tribunal by supplying information or materials, which may ask the respondent to give reasons, if his / her voters are not satisfied with any inconvenience. Can the Election Tribunal reject their nomination papers? The Election Tribunal did not take advantage of the treatment of the appeal, which was fatal to its case, and at this stage, the exception to the Constitution cannot be expressed. Respondents' candidacy was not a secret matter, as it was open to everyone and the inquiry about it was widely publicized. The electoral process such as papers had to complete the nomination scrutiny within a certain timeframe was more appropriate and convenient, if it was decided in terms of time, speed and convenience to receive relief in the constitutional application. Intervention by option will take the entire process of testing and present the candidate's nomination as an exercise. Elections were held in the waste land and the formal notification was near, in which case the entire process of elections could not be decided in any way; the selection of the respondents could only be called in question by an election petition. The post was not held The respondent can only hold a public office if he is notified
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate for immigration from Manoabad lawyer