MUHAMMAD TARIQ versus STATE
Section 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 324 and 34 of the Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 11 Bail, further investigation grant mention of the accused in the FIR Was not done Apart from the complainant's suspicion, there was no evidence other than that the accused was accused of being involved in the criminal case but nothing was recovered from the accused during the interrogation and the police also found him innocent. Was declared although police were not to be searched. The court obliged, but in the present case, the opinion of the police was found to be based on proper reasons and the facts and circumstances of the case were confirmed which could be relied upon for the grant of bail. No pertinent evidence was available against the accused. The suspect could not be detained indefinitely on suspicion of the complainant only to believe that he was associated with murder or kidnapping, when he (the accused) had otherwise succeeded. Dedicated to dealing with further inquiries under section 497 (2), bail as CRPC cannot be withheld as the convict was admitted to bail under the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of supreme court advocates from Astore lawyer