Find a Lawyer

GHULAM QASIM versus ASGHAR KHAN

Section 497 (5) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 337H (ii) and 457 Guarantees, the cancellation of the Prima against the accused was done under the first part of Section 457, although the PPC accused in the FIR Was nominated, but not named. He was alleged to have a special role and was only standing at the outer door of the complainant's 'mansion' outside the arms, while no details of the weapons were provided to him and some of them during physical remand. Was not recovered. One month after filing an FIR, which raised suspicion about the truth of the prosecution case, the invoice was submitted and, after the indictment, a trial trial was scheduled for recording, The trial is underway; at the present stage it will not be appropriate. Even negotiations regarding bail approval and bail cancellation were different and would require strong exception grounds. After the validity of the section (5) of section 497 was approved, banning the cell, CC PACI was not naturally punishable and there was no compulsion to cancel the bail unless granted bail. The verdict is clearly illegal, false, factually incorrect and does not result. In the case of abortion of justice; or where the accused was found to be abusing the bail privileges by threatening threats or tampering with the prosecution, in the present case the lawyer for the complainant identified any such illegality or weakness. Could not have requested an intervention in an unknown order. Without qualification, no qualification family advocate from Chaghi lawyer