Find a Lawyer

MUNSABDAR versus KHALID JAVED ALIAS MUHAMMAD KHALID

Section 417 (2A) Appeal Code (XLV of 1860), section 337A (i), (iv) / 34 appeal against the trial court while acquitting the accused was observed that during the incident an accused also Injuries were reported, medically examined on the same day and the probability of injury was the same, but said the wounds were suppressed by the complainant, it was said that three suspects were reportedly under hatchery at the time of the incident. Were equipped, but the doctor who examined three injured people with medical help. There was enmity between the two bodies, and the weapons allegedly recovered from the accused were not stained and did not rely on evidence of recovery because it had not been established. Weapons were used during the incident, the trial court provided good reasons for acquittal of the accused's lawyer, for the complainant not to read false news of any evidence or evidence on record by the trial court. Was the result of Interference with appeals against acquittal was a rare case that could not be made simply on the basis that a second theory could be adopted after the evidence was valid. Priority in favor of accused should not be allowed to interfere with appeal against trial immigration advocates phone number from Wah Cantt lawyer