Find a Lawyer

NOOR MUHAMMAD versus STATE

Testimony of Section 302 (b) Evidence Both the witnesses of the prosecution made specific allegations and all of them were declared specific injuries, the five accused were acquitted of the three accused and no appeal was filed against them. That is, both witnesses were denied while they were convicted of the acquittal, the trial court relied on the recovery and motions. Both of the injured persons made statements in the prosecution, which injured more than 24 hours. The statement of the prosecutor's witness was recorded, without any reason, the truth of the whole case was questioned. Prosecutor's witness was not ashamed to lie, his statement that the defendants were 1/1/2 feet away when they fired at the victim, medical evidence was not supported, complainant Also improved during his statement. He was confronted by the court and his first statement before the trial, and the rest of the accused were denied, whose role was inconsistent with the role of the accused even if the evidence of recovery was to be believed. So, he did not support the prosecution's case, as he did not have any credibility in the gathering space on occasion. Was kept in the police station for two months and received the laboratory report approximately 20 days after receipt, other articles were also sent to the Chemical Examiner after considerable delay, medical evidence only to the extent of the prosecution's case. Supported that he lost his life late. Fire on arm injury, but it did not face the attackers, injured the prosecution witness. tax advocates from Jaja Abasian lawyer