Find a Lawyer

SH. ZAHID JAVED versus STATE

Section 497 Control of Narcotic Substances (XXV of 1997), Sections 9 (c), 21 and 25, denied the lawyer's argument about the defendant's counsel that the defendant's case should be denied only because of The raid was done because of. In a section in violation of the Control of Narcotic Material Stances Act 1997, the FIR of the merit itself was not filed with the relevant police station Investigation for further investigation after the raid proceedings and the effectiveness of the prohibited recovery. Was sent. Section 25 of the Control of Narcotic Material Stances Act 1997 provided a complete response to the objection that while implementing the recovery, the provisions of section 103, CRPC were not implemented, it was to be seen that the sealed parcels were sent. Why am I delayed? There was nothing in the confessional law about the chemical examiner and what would be the effect of the accused's lawyer, which led to it being said that officers implementing the Control of Narcotic Material Stances Act 1997 were involved in sixteen criminal cases. There were at least a dozen drug-related cases in which bail was denied. online advocate from Makli lawyer