JAVED IQBAL BUTT versus NIGHAT ARA
Section 15 of the Punjab Tenancy Act (VK 1887), Section 60 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), leave the appeal allowed to consider (i) the original tenant who pre-emptioned in 1973 During his lawsuit, he died in 1976 of lawlessness before any order was passed. (ii) The High Court erroneously asserted that the right to premature possession was inherited and that the son of the original tenant, who was found to be the successor tenant, was inadmissible. (iii) The right was not inherited in due time. (iv) That the pre-emptive right of any right given to a tenant by martial law regulation cannot be continued till after his death under section 60A, all relevant under the Punjab Tenancy Act. The tenant does not remain on the steps. , And (v) that the eldest son of the original tenant may be considered a tenant under the law alone but the case cannot be decided in his favor because, he has
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocates from Dargai lawyer
