ASHIQ HUSSAIN SHAH versus ASHIQ ALI SHAH
The Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) was against the applicants of fact-finding by all the courts below the leave of appeal and they have failed in their claim. The request was not properly granted. One problem; that they remain in their possession through a gift gift that was previously canceled and that they have completely eliminated the burden of the negative possession issue and that the respondents did not comply with the previous decree. However, for these reasons the applicants should have been in negative possession. , No petition was moved so that the matter could be resolved at the appropriate stage, otherwise there was no scope for the petitioner to reopen the decision on the basis of a combination of facts from all the courts below. Even if no injunction has been imposed against the defendants. Applicants say that there will be no room to prove the fact that the applicant's alleged occupation was never harassing or advertising.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates from Pak Pattan Sharif lawyer
