MUHAMMAD ALEEM versus STATE
Section 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 312 and 392 guarantees further investigation was found to have no role other than aerial firing from a pistol, which was allegedly recovered from it during the investigation. It was The pistol was sent to the forensic science laboratory and it is also learned that they were recovered from the spot, but the forensic science laboratory objection report said that none of the pistols mentioned were identified by the accused against the parade. Was. Earlier, the prosecution's witnesses were shown and that the police had taken photographs of them during the interrogation at the police station, but only two prosecution witnesses had identified the accused, but the complainant could not identify them, The recovery of money alone was not enough for the first accused, who was charged with the alleged crime, who was not involved in such cases before, succeeding in making Fu's case for the time being the accused in an illegal inquiry. Bail was admitted, in the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Tharparkar lawyer