Find a Lawyer

KASHIF SADDIQUE versus STATE

Sections 302 (b), 324 and 427/149 of the Counter-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Sections 7 (a), 7 (d) and 7 (c) of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13 Testimony was a true and natural witness to the incident, who fully supported each other and their statements affected confidence, the presence of the injured prosecutor's witness can not be doubted because he has used medical evidence to investigate the incident. During the course of his injury. The presence of the complainant was also natural at the time and place of the incident that the recovery of criminal weapons from the accused was also proved and according to the report, [empty cases of crime related to the forensic science laboratory with the weapons mentioned above. Weapons that were found to have committed any technical defects through investigation) Affecting the officer's recovery, such as in violation of Section 103, the CRPC did not dismiss all evidence of the prosecution. It was taken by Alibi's allegations that he had gone to Iran and that he was not angry at the country on the day of the incident. Was not taken up by the investigating officer and after taking legal advice from an expert was raised in the trial court had failed to prove the specific request by adding the suspect and reliable evidence. Bound to act under the law, and he cannot blame the prosecutor for failing to prove that he did not affect the trust found in the defense evidence presented by the defendants in support of Alibi's plea. The photos produced had no identifiable value and the hotel bill was prepared. From them attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Mangal Sada lawyer