AHMAD DIN versus HASEEB ULLAH
Section 249A, 245, 417 (2A) and 439 (5) Amendment Regulations (XLV of 1860), Section 406 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Application for Review of Constitution Petition Retained Under Section 249A A complaint has been filed by the complainant against the acquittal of the accused. By the CCP Magistrate, the Sessions Court dismissed it for non-manageable circumstances, with the non-deferred injunction requiring the Weldery Magistrate to acquit the accused at any stage of proceedings under Section 249A, CRPC. There was no distinction between being acquitted under Section 249A, CRPC. Or, after the recording of the evidence under section 454545, CCP Acquital did not record the evidence by a competent court of law or recording of the evidence, does not determine whether to modify or appeal the appeal. Because it was enforced by the legal provisions of section 41717. (2A), the CRPC, which ordered an acquittal to file an appeal against the acquittal sessions court, was, therefore, rightly received. Is that the review petition filed by the complainant is not enforceable under Section 9 filed9 (the), CCPC and the injunction has not been subjected to any illegal proceedings otherwise, the complainant / Applicants received substantial treatment under Section 1717 2 (2A), CRPC. According to the High Court constitutional petition, the order of acquittal before expulsion and the appeal against the constitutional petition was not upheld.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firms from Goular Khel lawyer