Find a Lawyer

BABAR TAJ versus STATE

The testimony of Section 2 302 (b) was absent from the incident; none of the prosecution's witnesses was aware of the deceased's death, the three co-accused were revealed for the last time, who according to the FIR Calling them out of the house was not credible, saying they had no intrinsic significance. Evidence of the alleged extra-judicial confessions made by the deceased's relatives was unnatural, and the prosecution's uncontested prosecutor's witnesses presented the details of the extra-judicial confession of only one co-accused before the trial court. There is nothing available on the record about the extra-judicial confession made by the present accused, as the accused persons who made the statement that they have similarly confessed, as heard by the prosecution's witnesses. None of the facts that can be taken can be taken as a piece. With the evidence, if it was not explained before the trial before the trial, then he could not be convicted only on the GG. The co-accused had provided a confessional statement and the accused had made the statement in the same letter. Because the statement of the accompanying accomplice cannot be used against any of the accused by any means of imagination, even the additional criminal confession made by the accused in the eyes of the law in connection with the accompanying offense. There was no sanctity and this was denied. Positive reports from the Franzik Science Laboratory were of no use when the suspect was sent to the chemical testing office until the suspect was identified. law firms from Dina lawyer