Find a Lawyer

HUSSAIN BAKHSH versus MUHAMMAD KHAN

Section 302/34 Definition of Evidence 2 The two accused A and B were the real brothers of the original accused who had shot the fatal and the third accused C was also the relative of the principal accused. All the suspects were shown to be armed with firearms, but they did so by not blaming any character for causing any fireworks, except that he excluded the incident. The complaining party threatened serious consequences when he and the other accused were later beaten by the accused B&C. The victim had the right and the left, but it was not clear in the FIR whether the two suspects were handed over to anyone else or placed on the ground, there was no recovery in the prosecution of the accused. ? The trial against the accused was not supported by any evidence; there was former rivalry and enmity between the parties. In such cases, it is likely that the accused was put on trial because of their relationship with the original accused, denial could not be excluded as the complaint in which the case was registered is not supported by any independent evidence. Because it allegedly existed against the complainant. Along with his son, but the complainant did not receive a notice from the accused investigating officer presenting as a court witness, the police had made a statement regarding the innocence of the accused, though It was not bound by the court, but it could not be thrown to the air. The prosecution's case against the suspects was not free from doubt, the trial court granted, top advocate from FR Peshawar / Kohat lawyer