Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD BASHIR versus GHULAM AKBAR

Para 3A Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) The same property was auctioned three times In the third auction, the appellants acquired property when the rights of the third auction under the first and second auction disappeared. The matter is not challenged and the competing respondents are kept alive. The second auction did not have any right. The third auction was not challenged. It survived. However, after the third auction, the security deposit could not be deposited in the stipulated time. Deposit which is allowed to deposit the entire balance price including settlement. The fee was substantially complied with Para 3A of the Settlement Scheme No. VIII, and occurred when no one had any right in the property to raise the question of auction on its restoration and the subsequent proceedings. His attacks were later overruled. online advocate from Manga Mandi lawyer