Find a Lawyer

ILAM DIN versus MUBARIK ALI

Article Q 54 Qualified evidence (10 of 1984 1984), Article 102 of oral exclusion by documentary evidence, when not attracted / attracted, sells less than one hundred rupees for sale. There was no need to do so, however, in such a document, the writings of Article 102 were reduced by law and attracted to the provisions of Article 102 of this testimony. It is clear that the secondary evidence of the contents of such a document is admissible where the oral evidence about the contents of a document is admissible but it is only related to the fact or the existence of this transaction, such evidence properly Which will not be excluded by the provisions of Article 102 of the Canaanite testimony. solicitors from Matli lawyer