AFZAAL AHMED KHAN versus DIRECTOR-GENERAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, LAHORE
Section 21 (3) (b) Pakistan Environmental Protection Act (XXXIV of 1997), Sections 17 and 19 of the Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Section 265C (2) (a) (i) and 265 K Environmental Protection and Effective Waste Private complaint was filed by the complainant for legal notices, list of witnesses and summary of evidence, not issuing notice by complainant, but by a lawyer, notice was issued by the complainant and the complainant also used the list of witnesses and evidence. The summary was not filed after issuing the notice and after waiting for thirty days, the compulsory filing complaint was not complied with and the complaint to the Environment Tribunal was intended. Was to be issued by the aggrieved person and not by a lawyer who was not so competent to move the complaint without notice. According to the notice required under section 21 (3) (b) of the Punjab Environmental Protection Act 1997, , The complainant was unable to proceed to the trial of the accused because the required condition was missing. The plaintiff, in a criminal complaint, had the legal obligation to provide a list of witnesses, as well as a list of witnesses, to independently present each witness to the tribunal / court testimony, with all defendants complaining of the list provided Called and inspected by the provider. Before the trial can begin, the criminal code of conduct can be resolved only by adopting the procedure provided in 1898, to present a list of witnesses against the charges. Summarizing the evidence was not merely technical. By default, it should not only be a surprise
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
