Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHEHBAZ versus STATE

The value of suspicion of Section 302 evidence was last seen by prosecutor's witnesses, who last saw that the defendant did nothing in spite of the four days' interrogation of the prosecutor's witness even though he cited a man Was informed about the body of the deceased by telephone. But even that person was not produced by the prosecution. During the investigation there was no weapon of crime or alleged donkey cart was recovered and the accused was sentenced at trial. He was sentenced to life imprisonment, no motive was available for the incident, Naish was from an unknown person. The location of the incident was not identified by the accused. No additional judicial or judicial confession was obtained and no recovery was made. Only the evidence of the last evidence was available which was destroyed by medical evidence, so there was no evidence that the prosecutor failed to establish his case against any of the suspects. The convictions were set aside and the accused was acquitted, in which case an appeal was allowed. best advocate from Gakhar Mandi lawyer