Find a Lawyer

JAFAR HUSSAIN ALIAS JOJO versus STATE

Section 497 Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), Section 392 Bail, the accused's grant was neither designated, nor involved in the complainant's supplementary statement, nor the identification parade for the identity of the accused. Was held. Add the accused to the commission of the crime, since it was not established that the money recovered was actually a refunded amount and that such recovery was not important, the case against the accused's prime fee was false and fabricated. And, therefore, there can be no reliance on police witnesses who had recovered from a clear violation of section 103, the CCPC's admission of such other criminal commission to the police is of no importance. And can't be sent back. Unless his conviction is proved in the courts unless his conviction is proved in court, the exception of criminal cases against the accused in the court will not entitle him to the same. If a history shutter or record holder was claimed, further investigation into his crime was required and he was admitted on bail under the circumstances. criminal advocate from Hattian lawyer