KASHIF NADEEM ALIAS STYLO THROUGH SPECIAL ATTORNEY versus STATE
Section 302 (b) Definition of Evidence In the event that it was not possible to commit false impacts on the accused during the day, the complainant and other witnesses had no valid reason to prove the original culprit involved in the fines. So that the case can be delayed. The FIR was appropriately described by the complainant, who apparently was due to provide immediate medical assistance to the deceased while he was injured on doctor's advice and had no results. Was. Witnesses were naturalistic and their presence was well-defined at the time of the incident, which provided visual details of the events leading up to the death of the deceased. The ocular testimony agreed on all the material details of the case, leading to the conclusion that the victim was killed. In the presence of witnesses, the motive behind the incident was proved by reliable and credible e-death. The death of the deceased in the state of death under the threat of death was not illegal or vulnerable. Details were provided, as well as reliable evidence that the purpose of the same knife, which was recovered at the defendant's request at the residence of the accused, was found to have been stained with human blood. The Ocular Account has received further confirmation due to medical events, and the death sentence for the accused has been retained.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocates from FR Peshawar lawyer