Find a Lawyer

SYED GHULAM HASSAN versus STATE

Section 497 (2) of the Customs Act (IV of 1969), Sections 156 (1), (8), (14), 157, 178, 32 (1) and 16 bail, further investigation grants allegedly for two different bottles Two samples were seized out of 108 bottles of alcohol, and after more than four months of confiscation, lawyers appearing for the department sent the Chemical Examiner's office for analysis on how to obtain the samples according to the challan. Could not explain what was done. The property of the trial court was presented to the court and could only be interfered with with the permission of the court, but nothing was on record to show that there was any court from the court to obtain the specimen from the property of the case. Permission is requested or approved Such allegations by the department cast doubt on the prosecution's story, extending its benefit to the accused even at the bail-out stage, which had not yet been determined during the trial. Items that were exported were lost. Reducing the definition of smuggled items. And whether the provisions of section 156 (1), (8) of the Customs Act, 1969 were brought under the circumstances, further investigation came under the circumstances, the accused was entitled to bail privileges, in the circumstances law websites from Fateh Jang lawyer