Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHAUKAT versus STATE

The accused, who was apprised of Section 9 (c) evidence, was caught red-handed and recovered 4kg of heroin, 9kg and 30g of opium from his possession: the samples were sent to the Chemical Examiner for analysis and the report positive. The length of the retrieved witnesses was cross-examined, but their testimony was not dismissed; no evidence was presented in defense to prove the request of false witnesses on the statement of any witness, if his statement was true. The law did not require that all witnesses witness the recovery. To be presented to the police officer and assistant director of the court in the ANF, they witnessed the recovery and signed a recovery memo that was recovered in large quantities, so the question of falsifying drugs was rejected, the investigation said. The senior officer, who had no disease, was not entitled to any hostility or hostility against the accused who seized in excess of 10 or kilograms Se Nation prosecution proved his case beyond reasonable doubt, no scope for interference. Was not. r \ n famous supreme court advocate from Bahawalnagar lawyer