Section 497 of the Contempt Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 302 bail, was not credible for the statement of the two witnesses introduced by the complainant at the delayed stage, as the complainant and his counsel filed the High Court. The plaintiff had stated in clear terms that the murder was an unwarranted incident and that the said witnesses were first introduced to the Investigation Officer's dishonest and inaccurate advice, ignoring the statements made by eyewitnesses, against the accused. There was no evidence to connect. Thus, the High Court had no option but to pass the accused's bail on murder and corruption charges and accordingly he was admitted in bail as well. However, these persons were taken into custody by the police. No need to skip on. A criminal case was initiated in a baseless or dishonest manner or the record was deemed unnecessary, open to correction by the High Court under hereditary and constitutional jurisdiction. Investigation conducted by the first investigator Since the allegation was deliberate and dishonest, the High Court, taking notice under the said jurisdiction, directed the Inspector General of Police to submit a probe into the matter and entrust it to a team of honest and straightforward senior police officers. ? Legal action against the aforementioned investigator, who, after shaking hands with the accused, hurriedly submitted the challan without collecting evidence. In such cases it would be futile to proceed with the prosecution of the accused, therefore, the sessions were held before the court till the completion of the investigation, as requested above.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
