Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

HARI KISHAN MEHRA versus CUSTODIAN, EVACUEE PROPERTY


Articles 2302 and 5 325 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) complainants' plea that the High Court did not point to the accusation of wounds inflicted on the victim by the accused. Does not indicate his intention to kill. Looking at the dimensions, it appears that the suit used by the accused was not thin wood. The injuries were mostly located on the head and neck. At the time of his death, his death was 60/65 years. In view of the fact that the accused had repeatedly hit an elderly man on the head and neck, his intention to kill could easily be attributed. And, therefore, the High Court was not OK to acquit the accused under Section 302, the Code of Conduct, which requires consideration.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
famous high court advocate from Ahmadpur East lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.