MUHAMMAD ASHRAF versus ARSHAD MAHMOOD
In the previous proceedings of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), the application for removal of the restraining order against the applicant was dismissed with time constraints, as well as his constitutional petition of the applicant. The reason for the unsuccessful applicants is on a case-by-case basis. On the facts, the lower courts had given the correct verdict and at the same time came to a correct conclusion that the constitutional jurisdiction was arbitrary, it was used by the High Court from the judicial record that the petitioner gave the respondents. He did not pay a single penny, till the last time his younger son continued for four years, the High Court rightly denied the applicant relief.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous lower court advocate from Tando Adam lawyer
