Find a Lawyer

KHALIL AHMAD versus STATE

Sections 7 (a) and 7 (h) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), sections 148 and 337l (2) of the evidence complimented by the victim's wife and the victim's mother's second complaint, filed by him. Never claimed in the FIR. An eyewitness to the incident, but five months after the incident, he himself witnessed his presence in what he saw in a private complaint. Contradictory statements were made by the accused and in connection with the events that took place during the incident, and the accused and their accomplices allegedly locked the role played by the parties in the confessional murder controversy. And they were involved in getting each other involved. In the backdrop of hostilities between the parties, various instances of murder, etc., for some time, were intended by the prosecution, which was a dual weapon and could be cut both ways. d Not provide secure support to the secular account offered against the accused No weapon was recovered from the accused's possession, none of the accused was awarded any special injury by the prosecution. The evidence could not provide any independent assistance to the individual accused, so as to confirm his participation in the allegedly lodged FIR filed by the complainant, was registered at the scene of the incident and not at the police station I, he pointed out that the same complaint was lodged after the alleged investigation and the initial investigation. Five months after the incident, the complainant also had ample time for the complaining party to falsely implicate anyone else. how to become a advocate from Bajaur lawyer