SYED AKBAR ALI SHAH NAQVI versus STATION HOUSE OFFICER/INCHARGE INVESTIGATION AND PROSECUTION BRANCH CUSTOMS INTELLIGENCE, GUJRANWALA
Article 156 (1) (77) and (85) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 The allegations made in the FIR in the constitutional petition for the termination of the FIR were found correct and the challan was presented in the trial court dispute. That was before an FIR was filed. In this case, there was no sense because the incident was mentioned as 2006 instead of 2007 due to a typographical error but only the delay in filing the FIR was not a valid basis for invoking the FIR. Could be made, that the accused has the proper alternative solution to reach the trial court's case under the law, primarily relating to disputed questions that could not be resolved by the High Court in his constitutional jurisdiction. Pending FIR, if it was terminated, would be equivalent to suppressing litigation.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
