MUHAMMAD SAEED ALIAS RASHID ALIAS SHEDA versus STATE
Definition of Section 2 302 (b) Evidence Appraised at this point in the circumstances of the case, the suspicion of the prosecution's story gave the impression that an attempt was made to prove the case. Is. It was either a deliberate attempt to circumvent the natural and direct evidence that could be made available to the prosecution by the prosecutor or a dishonest statement by the prosecutor, especially as the investigating officer said the circumstances strengthened the defense version. It is reported that the eyewitnesses did not see the incident but the co-accused saved the complainant from strangers who were at his mercy, and were a few feet away. This was impossible because neither the co-accused nor the accused could afford to avoid giving the complainant a chance to witness the incident, especially when they were fully in control of the situation and perhaps No one was justified in killing her. The effective role of the accused involved in the FIR, and then to state at the trial that it was merely a mistake, did not make the prosecutor's story credible. There was, at the time of both the recoveries, a private police-related witness who was affected by the house. Because of the joint occupation of the accused's relatives, they need strong co-operation. No person from the area concerned was involved in the recovery process. The recovered items were not sealed in a parcel and taken to the police station in the nude condition where no vacancy was found. The question of meeting the site does not arise whether the fire was shot from the same gun or not,
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
