Find a Lawyer

FAROOQ KHAN ALIAS MUHAMMAD FAROOQ versus STATE

Section 2 (2 (b)) of the value of the evidence, the presence of the complainant / injured eye witness who presented the eyewitness testimony of the incident, was established on the spot examined by the length of the testimony of Syed. The defendant was unable to suppress his testimony. According to the material point of view, the formal value of the statement of those witnesses cannot be ruled out and the reliance on their statement can be kept securely. The source confirmed the statement of the witness and found the medical evidence according to the ocular account which was behind the witness's motion, in which the complainant And there was a dispute between one of the accused in the presence of the police officer, which proved the recovery of the knife on the identity of the accused, in the presence of the police officer was as good as in the presence of any other public witness. Or, the trial court appreciated the evidence and correctly extracted the grain from the Chaff Pro by the statement of an injured eyewitness that the security was fully proved in the presence of the victim and He was proved by medical evidence, found under blood reclaimed land recovery and recovery and trial. Mr. convicted property advocate from Bhara Kahu lawyer