Find a Lawyer

DR. SALEEM H. MALIK versus BUILD MASTER THROUGH GENERAL MANAGER

O VII, R 2 The suit was a plaintiff's contractor, engineer and builder's business to recover the money and a contract was reached between the plaintiff and the defendant to construct a two-storey dwelling house. Additional work was also completed. The plaintiff paid the plaintiff some money through the plaintiff, but the defendant paid the balance due to non-payment, the plaintiff filed a lawsuit for his recovery, which is being sued by the trial court and the appellate court. The verdict was pronounced, the defendant requested a review against the same plaintiff which was not denied. The execution of the agreement between the parties, in a written statement, did not deny the details of the work done by the plaintiff because the defendant's offer was accepted by the plaintiff, nothing was on record from which It appears that the work was not done by the claimant. Definition and terms and conditions of the contract were never found defective in the completion of the work, nor was it indicated that the additional work was done according to the plaintiff's desire to be tapped / addressed by the plaintiff for which the additional The rate was claimed by fact-finding investigators of the lower courts did not face any illegal interference, misrepresentation or reading of evidence and there was no material misconduct. ? The plaintiff had fully proved her case through documentary evidence, along with her oral claim, which showed that the plaintiff had not paid the plaintiff a disputed amount of money. No trial for power of attorney advocate Kalar Syedian lawyer