Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD NAWAZ versus STATE

Sections 111111 and 7337a (i) of the FIR of appreciating the evidence revealed that the accused, who was the son of the victim, had `` suffered three injuries to the person killed by the gun, '' one such injury. It was strong that he separated the victim's neck from the head and the brain came out of the wound, the accused also hurt the prosecutor's witness. In this case, the star witness also suffered three injuries to the accused. Injuries were reported and it was explained in the FIR that the accused killed his father in a very brutal case under Section 302 (b). No appeal was made against the success of, the PPC was not filed either by the state or by the complainant itself did not seek the right of defense in its defense. During the cross-examination of the eyewitness account recorded under Section 342 CCPC or the circumstances, it was fully established that he was alleged to have committed the murder of his father and Kaz. ? Injury to the injured witness is not an issue, appeals were dismissed due to circumstantial interference. Pakistan, top advocate family court from Lalshanra lawyer