TABASSUM KHURSHID versus SARDAR ABID IQBAL
Section 5 and Schedule to the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional petition for dissolution of marriage and recovery of money, the Family Court upheld the decision to dissolve the marriage, but rejected the plaintiff's claim and dismissed the claim. The plaintiff claimed to have dissolved the marriage on the basis of `khula ', but he mentioned various instances of cruelty and mistreatment with the plaintiff / husband, the statement presented in the trial court. Therefore, it cannot be assumed that the plaintiff claimed to have dissolved the marriage. On the basis of ula khula the right of ula khula can be exercised only if these words are stated in clear words, whereas in the present case no such sentence was used nor ula khula. Only the word of the word is mentioned, the plaintiff cannot afford to lose his valuable right to double money on this score; the trial court upheld the decree dissolving the marriage in favor of the plaintiff and his condition Held by the FA. The national court declared the Dover money claim without legal authority and with no legal effect. \ r declared n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
patent advocate from Bajaur lawyer