Find a Lawyer

WASA versus INAYATULLAH

Sections 4, 18 and 54 of the Lahore Development Authority Act (XXX of 1975), Section 48 Appeal, the qualification of the land belonging to the respondents / landowners was obtained, and the compensation of the acquired land was declared, The aggrieved persons filed a reference in the referee court under section 18. The Land Acquisition Act, 1894, which was decided by the Lahore Development Authority Tribunal and the payment of compensation was increased, against which the Authority filed appeals under section 454 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, the respondent made a preliminary objection. Raised that the appeals against the tribunal's decision were not heard as the tribunal said was made under sections 558 and 60 of the Town Improvement Act 1922 (since it was repealed) and under section 59 (a) of section 59 The appeal provided under section 454 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 was not available against the decision of the tribunal. The acquisition question was initiated under the provisions of the Lahore Development Authority Act. An appeal was made against the decisions of Tribunal Sub-section 3 (ii) of section 48 of the Lahore Development Authority Act, 1975, read with the provisions of the Town Improvement Act, 1922, stating that from section 588 The provisions of 60 (repealed) will continue to apply in connection with the application of section 454 of the Town Improvement Act, 1922 Land Acquisition Act, 1894; Were not Ineligible like this tax advocates from Kachhi/Bolan lawyer