Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASHRAF versus ARSHAD PARVAIZ

Section 17 Personal Requirement of the Landlord Approval of a Eviction Request by the Controller Playa on the Tenant's Rental which Cannot Be Claimed by the Appellant, who, in his Proof, Confesses to Not Owning the Controversial Landlord What was Applicant was left to the tenant on the terms contained in the rental agreement, which in cross-examination the tenant appellant admitted that he was paying tax in respect of the disputed house, but receipts, in the name of his old landlord. But cross-examination stated that he had wrongly stated in the eviction request that he was the owner of the disputed house, but added that he was the original owner, while the papers were in the name of his old owner. Applicant's cross-examination submitted in evidence filed three months after his affidavit to the tenant in the name acknowledged that the controversial maca Was left to him by the appellant under a written agreement, and it was the appellant whose owner had terminated the tenancy, the appellant did not own any other house in his possession that required it. Was suitable for The High Court dismissed the appeal in the circumstances. criminal advocate from Mari Indus lawyer